<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brain Nutrition Facts &#187; Depression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/tag/depression/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com</link>
	<description>Improve Your Brain Health and Mental Performance Naturally</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is EPA or DHA Better for Depression?</title>
		<link>http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/brain-nutrition/epa-or-dha-for-depressio</link>
		<comments>http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/brain-nutrition/epa-or-dha-for-depressio#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jain, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHA supplement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omega 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omega-3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that it does indeed matter whether EPA (eicosapentanoic acid) or DHA (docosahexanoic acid) is in your omega-3 fatty acid supplement. A total of 21 studies using greater than 50% EPA or pure EPA in the supplement showed significant reductions in depressive symptoms. On the contrary, symptoms of depression were not reduced in 7 studies that used only DHA or more than 50% DHA. Unfortunately, there was evidence of publication bias towards positive trials with good results, and heterogeneity in the trials, limiting their ultimate applicability. Were the authors studying DHA just more honest?  That seems unlikely, as there were multiple groups publishing the results.  Still, this study provided some evidence that the content of your omega-3 supplements does matter, and that EPA might be better for depression.  (J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Oct;28(5):525-42.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that it does indeed matter whether EPA (eicosapentanoic acid) or DHA (docosahexanoic acid) is in your omega-3 fatty acid supplement. A total of 21 studies using greater than 50% EPA or pure EPA in the supplement showed significant reductions in depressive symptoms. On the contrary, symptoms of depression were not reduced in 7 studies that used only DHA or more than 50% DHA. Unfortunately, there was evidence of publication bias towards positive trials with good results, and heterogeneity in the trials, limiting their ultimate applicability. Were the authors studying DHA just more honest?  That seems unlikely, as there were multiple groups publishing the results.  Still, this study provided some evidence that the content of your omega-3 supplements does matter, and that EPA might be better for depression.  (J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Oct;28(5):525-42.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/brain-nutrition/epa-or-dha-for-depressio/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Study That Spawned Omega-3</title>
		<link>http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/brain-health/the-study-that-spawned-it-all</link>
		<comments>http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/brain-health/the-study-that-spawned-it-all#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jain, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Depressive Disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omega-3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this classic article to the Lancet, JR Hibbeln demonstrated that there was an inverse correlation between annual fish consumption in a country, and that country’s incidence of depression (Hibbeln, 1998.)  As you can see from the graph, those countries that consumed the most fish per capita, such as Japan, had the lowest rates of depression.  Vice versa, those countries where people consumed the lowest amount of fish, such as the United States, had the highest rates of depression per capita.  Of course, correlation is not causation – the fact that two things are linked does not mean one causes the other.  For that reason, epidemiological studies such as this one must be confirmed by other methodologies: mechanistic studies in cell cultures, animal models of illness, and randomized clinical trials.  Research on why fish consumption might help prevent depression has focused on omega-3 fatty acids.  Cellular studies have confirmed that Omega-3 fatty acids, found mostly in certain kinds of fish, but also in walnuts, soybeans, flaxseed, and some other plants, are integral components of the cell membrane of brain cells.  Without adequate omega-3’s, membrane dysfunction may lead to cellular dysfunction, and from cellular dysfunction to conditions such as depression. Next [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_107" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9643729?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=39"><img class="size-medium wp-image-107" title="Hibbeln_figure" src="http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Hibbeln_figure5-300x271.jpg" alt="Correlation Between Fish Oil and Major Depression" width="300" height="271" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Correlation Between Fish Consumption and Major Depression</p></div>
<p>In this classic article to the <em>Lancet</em>, JR Hibbeln demonstrated that there was an inverse correlation between annual fish consumption in a country, and that country’s incidence of depression (<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9643729?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=39" target="_blank">Hibbeln, 1998</a>.)  As you can see from the graph, those countries that consumed the most fish per capita, such as Japan, had the lowest rates of depression.  Vice versa, those countries where people consumed the lowest amount of fish, such as the United States, had the highest rates of depression per capita.  Of course, correlation is not causation – the fact that two things are linked does not mean one causes the other.  For that reason, epidemiological studies such as this one must be confirmed by other methodologies: mechanistic studies in cell cultures, animal models of illness, and randomized clinical trials.  Research on why fish consumption might help prevent depression has focused on omega-3 fatty acids.  Cellular studies have confirmed that Omega-3 fatty acids, found mostly in certain kinds of fish, but also in walnuts, soybeans, flaxseed, and some other plants, are integral components of the cell membrane of brain cells.  Without adequate omega-3’s, membrane dysfunction may lead to cellular dysfunction, and from cellular dysfunction to conditions such as depression.</p>
<p>Next week: what randomized clinical trials show about omega-3 consumption and depression!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brainnutritionfacts.com/brain-health/the-study-that-spawned-it-all/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

